The Rivers State High Court has ruled that the Governor of Rivers State has the constitutional authority to conduct state business with a minimum of three lawmakers, a ruling that mirrors the actions of former Governor Nyesom Wike, who previously conducted official state matters with as few as six lawmakers.
The ability of the state government to function effectively when the number of lawmakers present for crucial decisions is less than the usual quorum. The court reaffirmed the principle that the Governor is empowered to carry out state business as long as the necessary legislative processes are followed, even with a reduced number of lawmakers present.
The case, brought before the court by [name/party], hinged on whether the Governor of Rivers State needed a full complement of lawmakers to take action on pressing legislative matters. In its ruling, the court pointed out that the Governor's executive powers are distinct from the legislative quorum requirements, which had been previously established in the administration of Governor Wike.
"This judgment upholds the principle of governance flexibility and reaffirms the practicality of moving state matters forward even under less than ideal circumstances," said [Legal Expert/Spokesperson]. "It is in line with the precedent set by former Governor Wike, who took action with just six lawmakers when the state faced critical situations requiring swift decisions."
The decision has sparked reactions across various political factions, with supporters of the ruling arguing that it strengthens the Governor’s ability to govern effectively in cases of political instability or limited legislative participation. Opponents, however, have raised concerns about the potential for undermining democratic processes and accountability.
This ruling comes at a time when the Rivers State government is preparing for a new phase of policy-making, with a focus on addressing issues such as economic growth, security, and infrastructure development.