A prominent legal practitioner in Kwara State has issued a stern warning to Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq over what he describes as an “unjustifiable and dangerous delay” in the appointment of governing boards for key state institutions. The lawyer, Barrister Sulaiman Adegbite, expressed deep concern that the prolonged vacuum in board leadership is undermining transparency, accountability, and effective governance across the state.
Speaking at a press briefing held in Ilorin on Monday, Adegbite stated:“The continued failure to constitute statutory boards for agencies such as the Kwara State Internal Revenue Service, Kwara State Universal Basic Education Board, and others is not only a breach of administrative norms but a direct threat to democratic governance. These boards are critical for oversight, policy direction, and institutional integrity.”
Adegbite emphasized that the absence of duly appointed boards has left many agencies operating without proper checks and balances, potentially exposing them to mismanagement and abuse of power. He called on civil society organizations, the media, and the Kwara State House of Assembly to demand immediate action from the executive arm.
“Governor AbdulRazaq must understand that governance is not a solo performance. The law mandates inclusive and participatory administration, and the delay in board appointments is a clear deviation from that principle,” Adegbite added.
The lawyer urged the governor to prioritize the constitution of boards with competent and diverse individuals who reflect the state’s pluralistic character. He also warned that continued inaction could lead to legal challenges and public protests.
“If this trend continues, we may be forced to seek judicial intervention to compel the government to fulfill its statutory obligations,” Adegbite concluded.
Governor AbdulRazaq, now in his second term, has faced growing criticism over delays in appointments and perceived centralization of power. While his administration has made strides in infrastructure and education, critics argue that institutional governance has lagged behind.